![]() We think of "round-trips" also when this sort of cycle extends to more pull/push subsequent actions. Or the reverse: references from EPPI-Reviewer which are pushed into Zotero, edited there and then pulled back into the original review. ![]() This refers to activities where data for the same reference is pulled from Zotero into EPPI-Reviewer, edited there and then pushed back into Zotero. We are open to all suggestions, although we usually need to make pragmatic "return of investment" decisions, when deciding what to implement. ![]() Should you feel that we could have made better "translation" choices, please do feel free to get in touch. This refers to the action where data is moved from a Zotero Group Library into an EPPI-Reviewer Review. For the other, seldom used types, our focus was limited to ensuring the most important data is preserved (Title, Abstract, Authors, etc.) and that they will not cause push or pull errors. In the table below, the EPPI-Reviewer types shown in bold are the ones for which we have made every effort in minimising "translation" issues. The "Push" term refers to the action that moves data from EPPI-Reviewer into Zotero. This sort of information is useful to spot potential data degradation issues, especially when dealing with unusual reference types, such as "Artwork", "Statute" or "Dictionary Entry". This page describes how references types are "translated" when they move between EPPI-Reviewer and Zotero.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |